Criminal Law · MBE-tested
NASH et al. v. UNITED STATES
186 F. 489·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1910
Before PAIiDEE and SIIEUBY, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NASH et al. v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 29, 1910.)
No. 1,951.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern Dis* trict of Georgia.
Criminal prosecution by the United States against the American Naval Stores Company, Edmund S. Nash, and others. From a judgment of conviction, defendants bring error.
Affirmed.
See, also, 172 Fed. 455; 186 Fed. 592.
Samuel B. Adams and Peter W. Meldrim, for plaintiffs in error.
Alexander Akerman, Asst. U. S. Atty., and W. M. Toomer, Special Asst. U. S. Atty.
Before PAIiDEE and SIIEUBY, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.
Rehearing denied December 20, 1910.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A majority of the court is of opinion that there is no error in the record. The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed.