Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arrow Transportation Co. et al. v. Southern Railway Co. et al., 1963 — 371 U.S. 944 · caselaw · US
General
Arrow Transportation Co. et al. v. Southern Railway Co. et al.
371 U.S. 944·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 430.
Arrow Transportation Co. et al. v. Southern Railway Co. et al.
Whiteford S. Blakeney on the motion for Statesville Flour Mills.
John W. Vardaman on the motion for Walley Milling Co.
Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, Paul Rodgers, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter R. McDonald on the motion for Southern Governors’ Conference et al.
Austin L. Roberts, Jr. and R. Everette Kreeger on the motion for the National Association of Railroad & Utilities Commissioners.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, ante, p. 859, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The motions of Statesville Flour Mills, Walley Milling Co., Southern Governors’ Conference et al. and the National Association of Railroad & Utilities Commissioners for leave to file briefs, as amici curiae, are granted.