General
Dionicio OTERINO v. UNITED STATES
19 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dionicio OTERINO v. UNITED STATES.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 12, 1927.
No. 4949.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; Paul'Jones, Judge.
William J. Corrigan, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
A. E. Bernsteen, U. S. Atty., and Irene Nungesser, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cleveland, Ohio.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Docketed and dismissed upon motion of counsel for the defendant in error.