General
Conrad Sipfle, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Alfred H. Isham, Appellant
137 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Conrad Sipfle, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Alfred H. Isham, Appellant.
(Argued January 26, 1893;
decided February 10, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made February 3, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon the report of a referee.
N. A. Nash for appellant.
Homer Weston for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.