General
Halsey Import Company v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 490·United States Customs Court·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Third Division,
November 13, 1957
No. 61342.
protest 294298-K (New York).
Halsey Import Company v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Johnson, J.]
Opinion by
Johnson, J.
At the trial, the collector’s amended memorandum was received in evidence, reading as follows: "Following Appraiser’s description & on appraised value as one piece the merchandise would now be properly classified at 45% under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930.” On the record presented, the compotes were held dutiable at 45 percent under the provision in paragraph 212, as modified, supra, for decorated chinaware, not tableware, not containing 25 percent or more of calcined bone.