Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hyman ADELBERG v. W. M. CUNNINGHAM, Trustee of Estate of Sol Jacobs, and Hyman Adelberg, Individually and as Copartners, d. b. a. New York Outlet, Bankrupts, 1929 — 32 F.2d 1013 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Hyman ADELBERG v. W. M. CUNNINGHAM, Trustee of Estate of Sol Jacobs, and Hyman Adelberg, Individually and as Copartners, d. b. a. New York Outlet, Bankrupts
32 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hyman ADELBERG v. W. M. CUNNINGHAM, Trustee of Estate of Sol Jacobs, and Hyman Adelberg, Individually and as Copartners, d. b. a. New York Outlet, Bankrupts.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 2, 1929.
No. 5102.
John J. Sterling, of Benton Harbor, Mich., for plaintiff in error.
Hilding & Hilding, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order of District Court affirmed, upon authority of Oriel v. Russell and Prela v. Hubshman, 49 S. Ct. 173, 73 L. Ed. -, decided by the Supreme Court on January 14, 1929. See, also, 21 F.(2d) 1006.