Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; and Cable, Telecommunications, and Technology Committee of the New Orleans City Council v. Federal Communications Commission et al., 2013 — 568 U.S. 1080 · caselaw · US
General
City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; and Cable, Telecommunications, and Technology Committee of the New Orleans City Council v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
568 U.S. 1080·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 11-1545.
No. 11-1547.
City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; and Cable, Telecommunications, and Technology Committee of the New Orleans City Council v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 936.] Motion of respondent Célico Partnership, dba Verizon Wireless, for divided argument denied. Motion of petitioner Cable, Telecommunications, and Technology Committee of the New Orleans City Council for divided argument denied.