Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Phenix National Bank, Appellant, v. John R. Keim, as Assignee of Thomas H. Spaulding and William H. Crosby, Appellant, and Thomas H. Spaulding et al., Respondents, 1903 — 175 N.Y. 521 · caselaw · US
General
The Phenix National Bank, Appellant, v. John R. Keim, as Assignee of Thomas H. Spaulding and William H. Crosby, Appellant, and Thomas H. Spaulding et al., Respondents
175 N.Y. 521·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Phenix National Bank, Appellant, v. John R. Keim, as Assignee of Thomas H. Spaulding and William H. Crosby, Appellant, and Thomas H. Spaulding et al., Respondents.
Phenix Nat. Bank v. Keim, 69 App. Div. 201, affirmed.
(Argued June 15, 1903;
decided June 25, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 2, 1902, upon an order reversing an interlocutory and final judgment in favor of appellants herein and dismissing the complaint.
Charles E. Rushmore and Forsythe Wiekes for appellants.
Norris Morey for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : ITaight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting : Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett and Cullen, JJ.