Torts · MBE-tested
Waldemar Von Wangenheim, Appellant, v. New York Stock Yards Company, Respondent
171 A.D. 897·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Waldemar Von Wangenheim, Appellant, v. New York Stock Yards Company, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 24th day of May, 1915, dismissing the complaint at Trial Term.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
We think that the negligence alleged in the complaint was not the proximate cause of the injury complained of, and that, therefore, the action of the trial court in dismissing the complaint was correct. It follows that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Present—.Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented. Judgment affirmed, with costs.