Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eliza C. Pardington, Appellant, v. Abraham Abraham et al., Respondents, 1906 — 183 N.Y. 553 · caselaw · US
General
Eliza C. Pardington, Appellant, v. Abraham Abraham et al., Respondents
183 N.Y. 553·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eliza C. Pardington, Appellant, v. Abraham Abraham et al., Respondents.
(Argued December 5, 1905;
decided January 9, 1906.)
Pardington v. Abraham, 93 App. Div. 359, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 29, 1904, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial.
George G. Reynolds and F. Reynolds for appellant.
George Gordon Battle and Frederick E. Fishel for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute order for defendants on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gkay, O’Bbien, Haight and Webnee, JJ. Dissenting : Babtlett and Vann, JJ.