Administrative
The City of Denver v. Hamilton
8 Colo. App. 392·Colorado Court of Appeals·1896·CO
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The City of Denver v. Hamilton.
Case Followed.
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of Denver v. Johnson, ante, p. 384.
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.
Mr. F. A. Williams and Mr. George Q. Richmond, for appellant.
Messrs. Doud & Fowler and Mr. W. W. Pardee, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The facts in this case are the same as in the City of Denver v. Johnson, ante, p. 384. Both parties were in the same wagon and received injuries in precisely the same way. The cases were tried together, but, of necessity, separate judgments were entered. In this case the judgment was |250, from which a separate appeal was taken. The decision in this case must be the same as in the former.
Affirmed.