Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kiobel, Individually and on Behalf of Her Late Husband Kiobel, et al. v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. et al., 2012 — 565 U.S. 1244 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Kiobel, Individually and on Behalf of Her Late Husband Kiobel, et al. v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. et al.
565 U.S. 1244·Supreme Court of the United States·2012
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10-1491.
Kiobel, Individually and on Behalf of Her Late Husband Kiobel, et al. v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 961.] Case restored to the calendar for reargument. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: “Whether and under what circumstances the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U. S. C. § 1350, allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States.” Supplemental brief for petitioners is due on or before Thursday, May 3, 2012. Supplemental brief for respondents is due on or before Monday, June 4, 2012. Reply brief is due on or before Friday, June 29, 2012. Time to file amicus curiae briefs is as provided for by this Court’s Rule 37.3(a). Word limits and cover colors for the briefs should correspond to the provisions of this Court’s Rule 33.1(g) pertaining to briefs on the merits rather than to the provision pertaining to supplemental briefs.