Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Peter S. Quick, a Judgment Debtor, Appellant, to be Discharged from Imprisonment. Charles E. Farrell, Jr., Respondent, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 601 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Peter S. Quick, a Judgment Debtor, Appellant, to be Discharged from Imprisonment. Charles E. Farrell, Jr., Respondent
179 N.Y. 601·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Peter S. Quick, a Judgment Debtor, Appellant, to be Discharged from Imprisonment. Charles E. Farrell, Jr., Respondent.
Matter of Quick, 93 App. Div. 131, affirmed.
(Argued November 14, 1904;
decided November 29, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 22, 1904, which reversed an order of the Saratoga County Court discharging the petitioner from imprisonment.
Fdgar T. Brackett for appellant.
John L. Henning for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Bartlett and Vann, JJ.