Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. SEWELL, 1910 — 217 U.S. 601 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES v. SEWELL
217 U.S. 601·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. SEWELL.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY.
No. 181.
Argued April 29, 1910.
Decided May 31, 1910.
United States v. Welch, 217 U. S. 333, followed.
Before the Government is required to pay for land held to have been taken by it, the owners should furnish a survey definitely ascertaining the land by metes and bounds.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General John Q. Thompson for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Edward S. Jouett for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Welch, decided April 25, 1910, ante, p. 333; but it is ordered that before the Government is required to pay. for the land held to have been taken plaintiffs below shall furnish a survey definitely ascertaining the land by metes and bounds.
Affirmed.