General
Protests 981907-G, etc., of Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Los Angeles)
8 Cust. Ct. 440·United States Customs Court·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Second Division,
January 14, 1942
No. 46819.
Protests 981907-G, etc., of Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Los Angeles).
[MAJORITY — Kincheloe, J]
Opinion by
Kincheloe, J
In view of the holding in Riley v. United States (8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 116, T. D. 37225), which was recently called to the court’s attention, wherein certain woven woolen spreads used to cover the legs and body in automobiles, on couches, or in carriages were held dutiable as woven blankets, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for, at 40 percent under paragraph 923 as claimed.