Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Jeanette Jones, Respondent, v. Rowena Jackson, Incorrectly Sued Herein as Wronea Jackson, Appellant
229 A.D.2d 1024646 N.Y.S.2d 467·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1996·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jeanette Jones, Respondent, v Rowena Jackson, Incorrectly Sued Herein as Wronea Jackson, Appellant.
[646 NYS2d 467]
[MAJORITY]
—Motion to vacate dismissal denied. Memorandum: In attempting to show merit to the appeal, defendant asserts that this case presents three issues of fact, thereby establishing that Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment and thus, there is no merit to the appeal. Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Balio, Davis and Boehm, JJ.