Contracts · MBE-tested
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Mrs. PATTIE G. WHITTEN and Lula B. Hammond, Appellees
31 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1929
Before WADDILL, PARKER, and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Mrs. PATTIE G. WHITTEN and Lula B. Hammond. Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
May 2, 1929.
No. 2833.
A. W. Woodcock, U. S. Atty., and Stanley E. Hartman, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Baltimore, Md.
Edward J. Colgan, Jr., of Baltimore, Md. (Karr & Colgan and Francis Key Murray, all of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees.
Before WADDILL, PARKER, and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration, we have reached the conclusion that the judgment of the United States District Court appealed from is free from error prejudicial to the appellant, and that the same should be affirmed.
Affirmed.