Contracts · MBE-tested

Joseph Scaramucci, Respondent, v. Man I. Landman et al., Doing Business as Hornell Amusement Company, Appellants

280 A.D. 1030·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1952·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Joseph Scaramucci, Respondent, v. Man I. Landman et al., Doing Business as Hornell Amusement Company, Appellants. [MAJORITY] Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an action to recover for services performed under contract. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ. [See 281 App. Div. 801.]