Corporations
V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United States et al.
350 U.S. 961·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 589.
V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United States et al.
John S. Burchmore and Robert N. Burchmore for appellant. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Donald Macleay for the Inland Water Carriers Freight Association, John H. Eisenhart, Jr. for the Great Lakes Ship Owners Association, Harry C. Ames, Jr. for the American Barge Line Co. et al., R. Gran-ville Curry and Frederick M. Dolan for the Union Barge Line Corporation, and James H. McGlothlin for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.