General

Angelita Tolly v. Department of Human Resources

26 Conn. App. 938·Connecticut Appellate Court·1992·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Angelita Tolly v. Department of Human Resources (10415) Foti, Heiman and Freedman, Js. Argued January 13 decision released January 28, 1992 Ann McClure, for the appellant (plaintiff). Judith Merrill Earl, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Richard J. Lynch, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (defendant). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The result in this case is controlled by three prior decisions of this court: Shapiro v. Carothers, 23 Conn. App. 188, 579 A.2d 583 (1990); Senie v. Carothers, 22 Conn. App. 253, 576 A.2d 1312 (1990); and DelVecchio v. Department of Income Maintenance, 18 Conn. App. 13, 555 A.2d 1007 (1989). Despite the invitation by the plaintiff to revisit this issue, we decline to do so. Nothing in these cases convinces us that they were wrongfully decided, decided on the basis of a flawed analysis, or represent aberrant appellate decisions as claimed in the appellant’s brief. The judgment is affirmed.