Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Canton Bridge Company, Respondent, v. The Board of Town Auditors of the Town of Horicon, Appellant, 1905 — 180 N.Y. 542 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Canton Bridge Company, Respondent, v. The Board of Town Auditors of the Town of Horicon, Appellant
180 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Canton Bridge Company, Respondent, v. The Board of Town Auditors of the Town of Horicon, Appellant.
People ex rel. Canton Bridge Co. v. Bd. Town Auditors, 95 App. Div. 620, affirmed.
(Argued January 11, 1905;
decided January 31, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered October 17, 1904, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to pass upon and audit a claim of the relator against the town of Horicon.
J. A. Kellogg for appellant.
John H. Cunningham for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.