General

GENE BAIRD et al., Appellants, v. EVERETT MAGUIRE et al., Respondents

125 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 907·Appellate Division of the Superior Court of the State of California·1954·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Bernardino [Civ. A. No. 18. June 3, 1954.] GENE BAIRD et al., Appellants, v. EVERETT MAGUIRE et al., Respondents. Swing & Gillespie for Appellants. H. R. Griffin for Respondents. [MAJORITY — COUGHLIN, P. J.] COUGHLIN, P. J. This is an appeal from a judgment in favor’ of the defendants in a claim and delivery action involving the possession of an automobile. The appellants contend that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain this judgment. The record before this court does not include either a settled statement of facts or a reporter’s transcript, of the oral proceedings before the trial court. Under these circumstances on appeal it must be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment. The judgment is affirmed. Hilliard, J., and Mitchell, J., concurred.