Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Minnesota v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Duluth & Iron Range Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Spirit Lake Transfer Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.; and Same v. Proctor Water & Light Co., 1941 — 311 U.S. 719 · caselaw · US
General
Minnesota v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Duluth & Iron Range Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Spirit Lake Transfer Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.; and Same v. Proctor Water & Light Co.
311 U.S. 719·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 539.
No. 540.
No. 541.
No. 542.
No. 543.
Minnesota v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Duluth & Iron Range Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Spirit Lake Transfer Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.; and Same v. Proctor Water & Light Co.
January 6, 1941.
Mr. J. A. A. Burn-quist, Attorney General of' Minnesota, for petitioner. Messrs. Elmer F. Blu, Clarence J. Hartley, George W. Morgan, and Cleon Headley for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
Reported below: 207 Minn. 618, 630, 637; 292 N. W. 401, 407, 411.