Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. Morehouse, Appellant, v. Frank H. Morehouse, Individually and as Executor of Hiram Morehouse, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 654 · caselaw · US
General
William H. Morehouse, Appellant, v. Frank H. Morehouse, Individually and as Executor of Hiram Morehouse, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others
161 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Morehouse, Appellant, v. Frank H. Morehouse, Individually and as Executor of Hiram Morehouse, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Morehouse v. Morehouse, 38 App. Div. 250, affirmed.
(Argued January 17, 1900;
decided February 6, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 31, 1899, reversing an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury, and dismissing the complaint upon the merits.
E. Winslow Paige and Alex. J. Thomson for appellant.
Charles F. Brown for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ. Not sitting: Landon, J.