Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302, et al. v. Angelos et al.; and Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302, et al. v. Tsakires et al., 1943 — 319 U.S. 753 · caselaw · US
General
Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302, et al. v. Angelos et al.; and Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302, et al. v. Tsakires et al.
319 U.S. 753·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 903.
No. 904.
Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302, et al. v. Angelos et al.; and Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302, et al. v. Tsakires et al.
May 17, 1943.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York in each case denied on the ground that it does not appear from the record that the federal question presented by the petition was properly presented to or expressly passed on by the New York Court of Appeals.
Mr. Louis B. Boudin for petitioners. Mr. Abraham Michael Katz for respondents.
See post, p. 778.