Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Farnum v. Connecticut et al.; Farnum v. Connecticut et al.; Farnum v. International Association of Machinists, 1958 — 358 U.S. 870 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Farnum v. Connecticut et al.; Farnum v. Connecticut et al.; Farnum v. International Association of Machinists
358 U.S. 870·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 963,
No. 716,
Misc.,
No. 717,
Misc.,
October Term, 1957.
October Term, 1957.
October Term, 1957.
Farnum v. Connecticut et al., Farnum v. Connecticut et al., Farnum v. International Association of Machinists,
[MAJORITY]
357 U. S. 919;
357 U. S. 916; and
357 U. S. 916. Petition for rehearing and other relief denied.
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.