Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In Re DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., applicants., 2018 — 139 S. Ct. 452 · caselaw · US
General
In Re DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., applicants.
139 S. Ct. 452202 L. Ed. 2d 345·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Justice THOMAS, Justice ALITO, and Justice GORSUCH would grant the application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In Re DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., applicants.
No. 18A455.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 2, 2018.
Application for stay presented to Justice GINSBURG and by her referred to the Court denied.
Justice THOMAS, Justice ALITO, and Justice GORSUCH would grant the application.