Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
O'CEDAR CORPORATION v. Mabel G. REINECKE, 1935 — 75 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
Corporations
O'CEDAR CORPORATION v. Mabel G. REINECKE
75 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O’CEDAR CORPORATION v. Mabel G. REINECKE.
No. 5475.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 8, 1935.
Joseph B. Lawler, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.
Dwight H. Green, U. S. Atty., of Chicago, 111., for appellee.
Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for appellee, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that this cause be docketed in this court, and that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.