General
East Chilliwack Fruit Growers Co-Operative, plaintiff v. United States et al., defendants
11 Ct. Int'l Trade 639670 F. Supp. 1004·United States Court of International Trade·1987
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
670 F. Supp. 1004
East Chilliwack Fruit Growers Co-Operative, plaintiff v. United States et al., defendants
Court No. 85-07-00978
(Decided September 8, 1987)
Bogle & Gates (Joel R. Junker, Christopher N. Weiss and Peter L. Miller) for the plaintiff.
Richard K. Willard, Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice (J. Kevin Hor-gan); and Office of Assistant General Counsel for Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (Eileen P. ’Shannon) for the defendants.
Kilpatrick & Cody (Joseph W. Dorn and Anthony H. Anikeeff) for the intervenor-defendants.
[MAJORITY — Aquilino, Judge:]
Memorandum and Order
Aquilino, Judge:
The court remanded this action to the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce OTTA”) for further proceedings in compliance with its Slip Op. 87-16, 11 CIT 104, 655 F.Supp. 499 (1987).
The ITA has submitted the results of those proceedings to which the plaintiff does not object. Having reviewed the remand results, the court finds them to be consistent with its order and notes in passing that the plaintiff is covered by the final remand results in the related case, Washington Red Raspberry Commission v. United States, CIT Consolidated Court No. 85-06-00789.
The results on remand are hereby affirmed, and judment will enter dismissing this action.