Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Milagros Otero, Respondent, v. Qubilah Davis, Appellant
83 A.D.3d 565920 N.Y.S.2d 669·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2011·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Milagros Otero, Respondent, v Qubilah Davis, Appellant.
[920 NYS2d 669]
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about November 10, 2010, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant failed to meet her burden to establish that New York is an inconvenient forum for this action (see Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, 478-479 [1984], cert denied 469 US 1108 [1985]; Bank Hapoalim [Switzerland] Ltd. v Banca Intesa S.p.A., 26 AD3d 286, 287 [2006]). There is nothing in the record to suggest that the court did not properly consider the relevant factors (see Pahlavi at 479). Concur— Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.