Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lottie P. Billingham, Respondent, v. E. P. Gleason Manufacturing Company, Appellant, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 571 · caselaw · US
General
Lottie P. Billingham, Respondent, v. E. P. Gleason Manufacturing Company, Appellant
185 N.Y. 571·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lottie P. Billingham, Respondent, v. E. P. Gleason Manufacturing Company, Appellant.
Billingham v. Gleason Manfg. Co., 101 App. Div. 476, affirmed.
(Submitted May 9, 1906;
decided May 25, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 24, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action by the legatee of a stockholder to have a dividend certificate previously issued by defendant and payable at its pleasure declared presently payable and to recover the amount thereof.
Roderick Robinson for appellant.
Oscar Wagner for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner, and Hiscock, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.