Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. Bowles, Price Administrator, 1944 — 321 U.S. 749 · caselaw · US
General
L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. Bowles, Price Administrator
321 U.S. 749·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. —.
L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. Bowles, Price Administrator.
February 28, 1944.
[MAJORITY]
The motion of petitioner to stay the mandate and to continue the temporary restraining order is granted and the mandate is stayed and the temporary restraining order continued until March 15 next, and if on or before that date a petition for a writ of certiorari is filed in this Court in this case, it is ordered that the mandate be stayed and the temporary restraining order be continued until the final disposition of the case by this Court.