General

In the Matter of Christie S., Respondent, v. Marqueo S., Appellant

106 A.D.3d 592965 N.Y.S.2d 348·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2013·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of Christie S., Respondent, v Marqueo S., Appellant. [965 NYS2d 348] [MAJORITY] Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about May 16, 2012, which confirmed the Support Magistrate’s finding that respondent-appellant father had willfully violated an order of support, dated August 23, 2006, and set an undertaking in the amount of $6,000, unanimously dismissed, without costs. As appellant resides in New Jersey, beyond the scope of the arrest warrant issued by the Family Court in connection with this matter, and he has not been in contact with his appellate counsel, he is presently a fugitive who is unavailable to obey the Family Court’s mandate in the event of an affirmance (Matter of Skiff-Murray v Murray, 305 AD2d 751, 752-753 [3d Dept 2003]). Accordingly, his appeal may not be heard (id. at 753; see also Wechsler v Wechsler, 45 AD3d 470, 472 [1st Dept 2007]). Concur—Gonzalez, EJ., Friedman, Moskowitz and Feinman, JJ.