Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People's National Bank of Charlottesville, Va., et al., Appellants, v. James H. Saville et al., 1906 — 201 U.S. 641 · caselaw · US
General
The People's National Bank of Charlottesville, Va., et al., Appellants, v. James H. Saville et al.
201 U.S. 641·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 218.
The People’s National Bank of Charlottesville, Va., et al., Appellants, v. James H. Saville et al.
Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Argued, and petition for certiorari submitted, March 16, 1906.
Decided March 19, 1906.
Mr. D. W. Baker for appellants and petitioners.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Paving Company v. Mulford, 100 U. S. 147; Gibson v. Shufeldt, 122 U. S. 27; Walter v. Northeastern Railroad Company, 147 U. S. 370; Chamberlin v. Browning, 177 U. S. 605; Hale v. Allinson, 188 U. S. 56. Application for writ of certiorari denied.
Mr. Fulton Lewis and Mr. John Ridout for - appellees and respondents.