Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alexander J. Scott, as Administrator of the Estate of Joseph J. Scott, Respondent, v. Nina Spencer et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 531 · caselaw · US
General
Alexander J. Scott, as Administrator of the Estate of Joseph J. Scott, Respondent, v. Nina Spencer et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
186 N.Y. 531·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alexander J. Scott, as Administrator of the Estate of Joseph J. Scott, Respondent, v. Nina Spencer et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Scott v. Spencer, 106 App. Div. 614, appeal dismissed.]
(Argued October 1, 1906;
decided October 9, 1906.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment, entered July 6, 1905, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling demurrers to the complaint.
The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment appealed from was not a final judgment under section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to review the same.
Ernest P. Seelman for motion.
AVoan P. Johnson opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs.