General
Joseph Golden, Respondent, v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company, Appellant
122 A.D. 885·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
First Department,
November, 1907.
Joseph Golden, Respondent, v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company, Appellant.
New trial.
Appeal from a judgment entered on the 28th day of December, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff and from an order entered on the 24th day of Decembei-, 1906, denying a motion for a new trial.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam :]
Per Curiam :
The facts disclosed by the evidence in the present case do not differ in any material particular from those involved in Dolan v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. (105 App. Div. 366). Upon the authority of that case the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — Patterson, P. J., Laughlin, Houghton, Scott and Lambert, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.