General
Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 541·United States Customs Court·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(Reap. Dec. 9580)
Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. United States
Entry Nos. 13389; 14019.
(Decided January 11, 1960)
Lane, Young & Fox for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant. ■
[MAJORITY — Mollison, Judge:]
Mollison, Judge:
The above-entitled cases were submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel upon the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the bamboo blinds and sets of hardware accessories involved, and that such value in each case is the invoice unit value, which includes the cost of 3 cents (United States currency) of each set of hardware accessories accompanying eaeh bamboo blind.
Judgment will issue accordingly.