General

In the Matter of Alex Astrab, Petitioner, against John F. O'Connell et al., as Members of the State Liquor Authority, Respondents. (Second Proceeding.)

274 A.D. 997·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1948·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of Alex Astrab, Petitioner, against John F. O’Connell et al., as Members of the State Liquor Authority, Respondents. (Second Proceeding.) [MAJORITY] This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of respondents, as members of the State Liquor Authority, revoking petitioner’s restaurant liquor license. We hold there was ample credible evidence to justify a finding that petitioner violated subdivision 3-b of section 102 and subdivision 12 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. For that reason the determination is unanimously confirmed and the proceeding dismissed, without costs. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, ’ Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See 275 App. Div. 668.] ’