Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
RYOTARO KISHIYAMA, Appellant, v. Walter E. CARR, District Director, U. S. Immigration Service, Appellee, 1932 — 60 F.2d 1086 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
RYOTARO KISHIYAMA, Appellant, v. Walter E. CARR, District Director, U. S. Immigration Service, Appellee
60 F.2d 1086·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RYOTARO KISHIYAMA, Appellant, v. Walter E. CARR, District Director, U. S. Immigration Service, Appellee.
No. 6898.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 26, 1932.
Before SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge, and ST. SURE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed; mandate forthwith.