Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kervick, State Treasurer of New Jersey v. Clayton et al.; and Levine et al. v. Clayton et al., 1971 — 403 U.S. 945 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Kervick, State Treasurer of New Jersey v. Clayton et al.; and Levine et al. v. Clayton et al.
403 U.S. 945·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 852.
No. 858.
Kervick, State Treasurer of New Jersey v. Clayton et al.; and Levine et al. v. Clayton et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from Sup. Ct. N. J. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decisions in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Earley v. DiCenso, and Robinson v. DiCenso, ante, p. 602; and Tilton v. Richardson, ante, p. 672.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Reported below: 56 N. J. 523, 267 A. 2d 503.