Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Adelbert P. Little, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester et al., Appellants, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 667 · caselaw · US
General
Adelbert P. Little, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester et al., Appellants
156 N.Y. 667·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adelbert P. Little, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester et al., Appellants.
Little v. Gity of Rochester, 87 Hun, 493, affirmed.
(Argued May 9, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered June 25,1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at the Monroe Equity Term,
A. J. Rodenbeck for appellants.
Horace McGuire and Walter S. Hubbell, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.