General
Matthew Hallinan, Appellant, v. James Murphy et al. Respondents
159 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Matthew Hallinan, Appellant, v. James Murphy et al. Respondents.
Hallinan v. Murphy, 88 Hun, 73, affirmed.
(Argued May 8, 1899;
decided June 6, 1899.
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered July 2,1895, upon an order overruling plaintiff’s exceptions ordered to be.heard in the first instance at General Term, and ordering judgment for defendants upon a verdict directed by the court and denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
E. P. Northrup for appellant.
Milford W. Eider for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.