Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stephen C. Jackson et al., v. Minnie Suydam et al., 1888 — 109 N.Y. 661 · caselaw · US
General
Stephen C. Jackson et al., v. Minnie Suydam et al.
109 N.Y. 661·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stephen C. Jackson et al., v. Minnie Suydam et al.
(Argued April 21, 1888;
decided June 5, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the City Court of Brooldyn, made December 27, 1887, which reversed an order of Special Term vacating two orders in the above entitled action made by said Special Term-
Oliver J. Wells for appellants.
Edward M. Shepard for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.