Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MANAGED FUNDS, INC., v. BROUK et al., 1962 — 369 U.S. 424 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
MANAGED FUNDS, INC., v. BROUK et al.
369 U.S. 424·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MANAGED FUNDS, INC., v. BROUK et al.
No. 87.
Decided April 16, 1962.
B. Walston Chubb for petitioner.
Forrest M. Hemker for Brouk et al. and William Stix for Baker et al., respondents.
Solicitor General Cox, Daniel M. Friedman, Allan F. Conwill and Walter P. North for the Securities and Exchange Commission, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Upon the suggestion of mootness and the joint motion of counsel to vacate and remand, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause of action as to the respondents.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.