Contracts · MBE-tested
UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al. v. CALIFORNIA
389 U.S. 330·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al. v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 669.
Decided December 11, 1967.
Hugh P. Cox, Henry P. Sailer, Dennis G. Lyons and William W. Vaughn for appellants.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and H. Warren Siegel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart
are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case assigned for oral argument.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.