Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al., 1960 — 361 U.S. 942 · caselaw · US
Tax
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al.
361 U.S. 942·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 165.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al.
/. Hart Willis, Wayland K. Sullivan, Harold C. Heiss, Clarence E. Weisell and V. C. Shuttleworth for petitioners-movants.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 361 U. Si 810, to the United- States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The motion to strike Items 1 and 2 of the cross-designation and amended cross-designation of parts of the record to be printed is granted;' The motion to strike other portions-of- the cross-designation and amended cross-designation is denied without' prejudice to such further order of the Court as to the taxation of costs as it may deem proper if it appears that the respondents have caused unnecessary parts of the record to be printed. Rule 36, Par. 7.