Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Treffle LEPINE, Bankrupt-Appellee, David B. Lefkowitz, Tishman Realty & Construction Co., and Minnie Lepine, Appellants, 1934 — 70 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of Treffle LEPINE, Bankrupt-Appellee, David B. Lefkowitz, Tishman Realty & Construction Co., and Minnie Lepine, Appellants
70 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Treffle LEPINE, Bankrupt-Appellee, David B. Lefkowitz, Tishman Realty & Construction Co., and Minnie Lepine, Appellants.
No. 395.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 30, 1934.
Nordlinger, Riegelman & Cooper, of New York City (H. H. Nordlinger and Jacob M. Dinkes, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Lieht & Lieht, of New York City (Benjamin H. Lácht and Arthur Averbuek, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Orders (4 F. Supp. 808) affirmed.