Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
3 F.2d 847·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MIRROLIKE MFG. CO., Inc., Plaintiff Appellant, v. DEVOE & RAYNOLDS CO., Inc., Respondent Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 3, 1924.)
No. 51.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
James L. Steuart and Frank S. Moore, both of New York City, for appellant.
William D. Gaillard and C. A. L. Massie, both of New York City, for appellee.
Before ROGERS and MANTON, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree (3 F.[2d] 840) affirmed.