General
Samuel E. Merwin et al., Appellants, v. Andrew Jackson Rogers, Respondent
130 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel E. Merwin et al., Appellants, v. Andrew Jackson Rogers, Respondent.
(Submitted October 13, 1891;
decided October 30, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made June 29,1889, which affirmed a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of New York in favor of defendant, entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
J. Homer Hildreth for appellants.
James C. De La Mare for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
°A11 concur.
Judgment affirmed.