Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ecker et al. v. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al.; Crocker First National Bank et al. v. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al.; Western Pacific Railroad Co. v. Ecker et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al.; and Irving Trust Co., Trustee, v. Crocker First National Bank et al., 1942 — 316 U.S. 654 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Ecker et al. v. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al.; Crocker First National Bank et al. v. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al.; Western Pacific Railroad Co. v. Ecker et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al.; and Irving Trust Co., Trustee, v. Crocker First National Bank et al.
316 U.S. 654·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 819.
No. 820.
No. 885.
No. 989.
No. 1086.
Ecker et al. v. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al.; Crocker First National Bank et al. v. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al.; Western Pacific Railroad Co. v. Ecker et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al.; and Irving Trust Co., Trustee, v. Crocker First National Bank et al.
April 27, 1942.
Messrs. Robert T. Swaine and Herbert W. Clark for petitioners in' No. 819. Messrs. Orville W. Wood and Arthur A. Gammell for petitioners in No. 820. Mr. Frank C. Nicodemus, Jr. for petitioner in No. 885. Solicitor General Fahy for petitioner in No. 989. Messrs. Harold C. McCollom and Orrin G. Judd for petitioner in No. 1086. Messrs. Edward G. Buckland and William J. Kane for the Railroad Credit Corporation; Mr. Robert E. Coulson for A. C. James Co.; and Mr. M. C. Sloss for the Western Pacific Railroad Corporation, respondents in Nos. 819, 820, 885, and 989. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton filed a memorandum on behalf of the Interstate Commerce Commission, as amicus curiae, in Nos. 819,820, and 989, urging grant of the writs.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.